Does Inclusive Truth Exist?

I think that you'll find that all truth is exclusive, not inclusive. For something to be true, it means that the opposite of it isn't true, thats exclusive. For someone to say, that all t-shirts are cool, that exclusive because it means also at the same time that all t-shirts can't be not cool.

Every major religion in the world is exclusive in some ways or another.

Christianity, obviously claims that the only name under which men can be saved is the name of Jesus.

Islam: Claims Allah is the one true God and Muhammad is his prophet.

Hinduism: Claims that there is not one way to heaven but reincarnation and karma that determines how many lifetimes you have before their concept of "heaven."

Buddhism: was started by rejecting the tenets of Hinduism and the caste system. (excludes some Hindu beliefs)

Ba'haism: The most inclusive religion in the world and becomes exclusive by excluding the exlusivists.

This concept is known as the law of non contradiction, meaning that if something is true, its opposite cannot also be true.

This is significant because a lot of people are looking for the all inclusive truth, and it doesn't exist because it can't its not intrinsically possible (another way of saying its not within the realm of possibility.)

I believe that for us to live consistently we must think through our beliefs to their logical conclusion so that we don't end up believing contradictory things and then have our world view shattered when someone comes along and challenges what could be fallible and incorrect assumptions.

I would like to state an alternate means of looking at these same issues, maybe not a popular one in this day and cultural age, but unpopularity doesn't discount an idea from being true anymore than popularity assures truth.

I think that it can be said that

1. The bible is true, it makes this claim of itself and also claims to be God-breathed. (If we don't agree on this point, thats ok, but it does throw a wrench in our starting points on this discussion.)

2. If the bible is true, it cannot also be not true (law of non contradiction.)

3. Things not included in the bible or from other cultures, religions etc. may be true or contain truth in them.

4. For things to be true and their converse to not be true, there must be a measuring stick to determine if they are true or not. I would suggest the Bible would be this measuring stick from point 1.

5. With point 3 being the case and assuming it might be true, we can safely say that things from other cultures etc. (I'm not listing a lot but this could mean everything else not in the bible, so tons of things) contain truth as in accordance with the measure of truth (bible) and be very adept at revealing, displaying, painting a picture of the truth or aspects of it. They don't define it because they can't, because certain aspects of the "everything else" would come into contradiction of the measure and they can't both be true.

Theology vs. Love: Which is more important?

One of the major questions/issues in the church today is what role theology has in the present church. Many of the emerging Christians of this generation boldly claim that theology has been abused and it needs to be relegated to the periphery and Love placed at the center. Christians need to stop systematizing God with theology and focus on the Love, Grace, and Mercy of Jesus.

I think there is a flaw in this logic. The flaw is that people say theology should be replaced with love...

I think that the difference in what is being talked about is what place should theology take in our faith. There seems to be a trend in this generation of post-moderns that love, acceptance, and inclusion of people is central to Christianity and theology is and should be on the periphery of importance.

I don't think this is the way things should be, nor do I think it's the way things are done, even for those claiming that this be the case.

I say this because our world views shape the way we perceive and do everything, our beliefs about life and God define everything. The way we define Christianiaty, love, acceptance, and goodness IS our theology. So though many people claim that love is more important than theology, it's apples to oranges. What we believe about God and how we define love towards others is our theology.

So the question or the issue at hand is not whether theology is central to Christianity, the issue is whether God-centered, bible defined theology is the theology we use? Or do we use a culturally defined, relative definition and application of love, inclusion, mercy etc.

I think that far too often we say theology is abused by Biblical brow-beaters (which often happens) and so our response is to redefine God, Love, and Jesus with culturally appropriate definitions that people "feel" better about.

The issue at hand which is dramatically affecting the entirety of the church and all of its denominations is where we get our definitions of Christianity, God, Love, Jesus, and Grace. For example, the Lutheran church just split over the issue of ordaining homosexuals. It was a theological issue, and half of the church defined "Grace" from the culture which says that homosexuality is a different lifestyle and to be gracious and loving, the church must not discriminate in its pastoral representatives in regards to sexual orientation. Most issues facing the church are theological in nature and the conflict comes in when it comes to where the definitions come from.

Some thoughts about sovereignty...

Most Christians would agree that God is Sovereign. In fact, He is described that way in the bible on numerous occasions. I think where you will find discrepancies in different denominations and flavors of the Christian world is what that actually means.

There are thoughts about sovereignty all across the board. Some would have you believe that means that God knows the future but can't or won't interrupt it, some believe that He doesn't know what the future holds but He knows the millions of potential future scenarios with every decision that's made but doesn't know which of those will come to pass. Some believe that God controls everything that happens and that humans have no ability to choose anything, and some believe this to the degree that evangelism is wasted and missions is fruitless because God is Sovereign and our actions irrelevant to any of His plans and purposes.

There is not time nor space to dive into this topic in a single blog in any depth, nor am I a qualified person to speak too much to this subject, but my aim today is just to identify some of the beliefs or world views we may hold that affect our ability to clearly and objectively navigate this subject.

We tend to believe....

That we have the ability to ultimately decide things without interference or influence...
That any/all of our choices are devoid of external influence...
That we can see the world clearly enough to make ultimately free choices...
That for a choice to be "real" it must be free of influence from God...
That for us to be morally responsible for our choices, God cannot ordain that they be...
That God is unaware of the colossal suffering and pain in the world...
That God unjustly allows or ordains the colossal suffering and pain in the world...
That we have a better measure of fairness and justice than God...
That we have the right to call God to the witness stand and demand justification for his actions or inaction that resulted in suffering and pain...
That we could continue existing if God chose to release his "preservation" of the world...
That we can see the big picture objectively enough to sit in judgment of God's actions or inaction...
That things are true because we believe them...
That things are true because we feel them...


So often our judgment as to whether or not God is right, wrong, or just is based on our experience of pain. If all is right in our world, God is not guilty, whenever there is pain, suffering, or death, God why did you let this happen?

We demand that God, the Bible, and beliefs about these two be seen through the eyes of the world, through the paradigms of the secular, political, or universalist.

Righteous vs. Unrighteous

Proverbs 24:16 For the righteous falls seven times and rises again, but the wicked stumble in times of calamity.

This verse is so heartening to sinners like myself. I can't tell you how often I need to come to the ocean of free grace and drink away my failings and shortcomings. Many people are so gifted at so many things, yet I seem to only be an expert at letting God down, failing in righteousness, and reverting back to my struggles and sins.

I can't tell you how many times a day I must come to the well and withdraw grace and forgiveness for my failures, it often seems an almost consistent and never ceasing need of God's mercy. I will say that I find verses like Romans 8:1 and Proverbs 24:16 helpful to ward off the shame and guilt that seems to plague my so constant failures.

It is so beautiful and liberating that the difference between the righteous man or woman and unrighteous isn't an issue of moral perfection. It isn't a difference of less failures and sins. It isn't an issue of tally marks for good behavior, it is a heart issue of desiring God, desiring to be with a clean, pure Savior in spite of all of my garbage and filth. It is the desire that drives us to rise again and be with Him after our 7th or 10,000th failure. The righteousness comes not from having less failures than the unrighteous, it comes from God and is displayed by rising again after every fall, every failure.

As one who loves God imperfectly, one who can't seem to get it right so much of the time, how freeing it is to realize that there is no shame, no condemnation, no guilt anymore in Christ. That has been lifted, that guilty verdict was already delivered to me and carried by my Jesus in AD 33. Now no matter how many times I fall, there is always enough grace to allow me to relinquish shame and guilt, to stand up once more through the Cross, and to rediscover the infinite treasure that is Christ.

Want freedom, don't strive towards moral perfection, strive to recognize the magnanimity of Grace in Jesus and display that Grace by depending on Him for the strength to rise again, and again, and again.